<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama&#8217;s Wealth Redistribution: Is It A Good Plan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/</link>
	<description>Good Habits for a Great Life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaley</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>I believe that wealth redistribution is not a intelligent idea that a president should have we all should be learning to work and scarifice for our wealth/income I worked hard to get what small income I have coming in, I don&#039;t have a job and am in the process of trying to find one, I have not gone up to someone rich and said gimme money I know in order to survive and learn diligent spending I have to work hard for what little income I get. SOCIALIST IS COMMUNIST (it&#039;s just different words but has the same meaning). If you don&#039;t work hard you shouldn&#039;t get the wealth, most wealthy people or their families worked hard to get where they are today. If the rest of the country got their wealth no one would want to work and everyone would feel like they are entitled to everything without scarifice and hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that wealth redistribution is not a intelligent idea that a president should have we all should be learning to work and scarifice for our wealth/income I worked hard to get what small income I have coming in, I don&#8217;t have a job and am in the process of trying to find one, I have not gone up to someone rich and said gimme money I know in order to survive and learn diligent spending I have to work hard for what little income I get. SOCIALIST IS COMMUNIST (it&#8217;s just different words but has the same meaning). If you don&#8217;t work hard you shouldn&#8217;t get the wealth, most wealthy people or their families worked hard to get where they are today. If the rest of the country got their wealth no one would want to work and everyone would feel like they are entitled to everything without scarifice and hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SRS</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>SRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>Ron, have you missed what happened in the Iraq war...palletes of cash went missing. That&#039;s just one little example. And letting a short-term tax cut expire is not raising taxes.

I own no envy of excessively wealthy thieves. I own terror for my son and his sons because of the plight our world is in.

Too bad we don&#039;t have capitalism. I&#039;m a big fan of it. We have elitist, government-sanctioned socialism that cycles money among the elite is not capitalism. Nor does it exist in cities where public systems are allowed profit margins or excessive pay for executive officers. No, Qwest tells me how much I pay, or I don&#039;t get to type this. There is no capitalistic balancing of scales.

Though you sound defensive in your comment, I like your vision in your article: that we risk everything by cranking up credit. We do. I like real wealth, not pretend wealth (which, by the way is another foible of the excessively wealthy...they own lots of numbers!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, have you missed what happened in the Iraq war&#8230;palletes of cash went missing. That&#8217;s just one little example. And letting a short-term tax cut expire is not raising taxes.</p>
<p>I own no envy of excessively wealthy thieves. I own terror for my son and his sons because of the plight our world is in.</p>
<p>Too bad we don&#8217;t have capitalism. I&#8217;m a big fan of it. We have elitist, government-sanctioned socialism that cycles money among the elite is not capitalism. Nor does it exist in cities where public systems are allowed profit margins or excessive pay for executive officers. No, Qwest tells me how much I pay, or I don&#8217;t get to type this. There is no capitalistic balancing of scales.</p>
<p>Though you sound defensive in your comment, I like your vision in your article: that we risk everything by cranking up credit. We do. I like real wealth, not pretend wealth (which, by the way is another foible of the excessively wealthy&#8230;they own lots of numbers!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin @ The Money Hawk</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin @ The Money Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>It pains me to read the unintelligent and irrational comments these people have left you Jeff.  It almost makes me sick to my stomach that people can be this ignorant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It pains me to read the unintelligent and irrational comments these people have left you Jeff.  It almost makes me sick to my stomach that people can be this ignorant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Link Love - Haunted Play-Doh Edition &#124; One Caveman's Financial Journey</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Link Love - Haunted Play-Doh Edition &#124; One Caveman's Financial Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2420</guid>
		<description>[...] Barack Obama’s Wealth Redistribution: Is It A Good Plan? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barack Obama’s Wealth Redistribution: Is It A Good Plan? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron@TheWisdomJournal</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron@TheWisdomJournal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>Written by Jim Cardoza at Liberty Pen:

The concept of socialism, or economic justice, is widely taught in our schools as the natural evolution of a compassionate society.  Politicians like to peddle the notion as a means of achieving fairness or equality.  But, it never works out that way---unless making everyone equally poor was the goal.  The whole scheme is nothing more than using Peter&#039;s money to buy Paul&#039;s vote.

Those duped into investing in the moral stance of socialism should consider the following.  If I stick a gun in your ribs and demand your money, I have clearly committed theft.  Yet, a socialist will perpetrate that same act and, merely because a politician is substituted for the gun, claim moral high ground.  The fact is, the act is identical, only the legal status changed.

Free market economics, or voluntary exchange, is the exact opposite of socialism.  It is a system in complete accord with the principles of liberty.  Free markets encourage cooperation, risk-taking and innovation, while rewarding success and achievement. 

No matter how selfish their motive, players in the free market must serve their fellow man with products and services so valuable, customers will willingly exchange their money.  In order for any transaction to occur, it must be seen as mutually beneficial.  The typical result is to satisfy the parties involved.

By contrast, when politicians and bureaucrats make decisions in our behalf, as socialists advocate, another set of dynamics come in to play.  Since bureaucrats are not dealing with their own money, there is little motivation to get value for the dollars they spend.  And, with decision makers largely insulated from the consequences of their actions, our satisfaction with the transactions they make in our behalf become hardly a consideration at all. 

The temptation may be strong to accept the popular class warfare notions promoted by pandering politicians and their relentless media allies---that the rich attained their wealth by exploiting the poor.  It then follows that unless we empower a modern day Robin Hood, individuals have no chance at prosperity. 

But, citizens beware.  While Robin Hood was a community organizer of sorts, he was a fierce enemy of the tyrants atop a powerful, central government.  While Barack Obama wants you to believe that he is a new Robin Hood, a close inspection of his beliefs show a far greater resemblance to the Sheriff of Nottingham.

Economic liberty is a fundamental element of political liberty.  It is the cornerstone principle from which the American Dream has been built.  By trading it in for a false and immoral view of fairness, Americans will do nothing short of squandering their precious right to self-determination.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Read Ron@TheWisdomJournal&#180;s lastest article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheWisdomJournal/~3/436559483/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Standard of Living: The Next Bubble To Pop?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written by Jim Cardoza at Liberty Pen:</p>
<p>The concept of socialism, or economic justice, is widely taught in our schools as the natural evolution of a compassionate society.  Politicians like to peddle the notion as a means of achieving fairness or equality.  But, it never works out that way&#8212;unless making everyone equally poor was the goal.  The whole scheme is nothing more than using Peter&#8217;s money to buy Paul&#8217;s vote.</p>
<p>Those duped into investing in the moral stance of socialism should consider the following.  If I stick a gun in your ribs and demand your money, I have clearly committed theft.  Yet, a socialist will perpetrate that same act and, merely because a politician is substituted for the gun, claim moral high ground.  The fact is, the act is identical, only the legal status changed.</p>
<p>Free market economics, or voluntary exchange, is the exact opposite of socialism.  It is a system in complete accord with the principles of liberty.  Free markets encourage cooperation, risk-taking and innovation, while rewarding success and achievement. </p>
<p>No matter how selfish their motive, players in the free market must serve their fellow man with products and services so valuable, customers will willingly exchange their money.  In order for any transaction to occur, it must be seen as mutually beneficial.  The typical result is to satisfy the parties involved.</p>
<p>By contrast, when politicians and bureaucrats make decisions in our behalf, as socialists advocate, another set of dynamics come in to play.  Since bureaucrats are not dealing with their own money, there is little motivation to get value for the dollars they spend.  And, with decision makers largely insulated from the consequences of their actions, our satisfaction with the transactions they make in our behalf become hardly a consideration at all. </p>
<p>The temptation may be strong to accept the popular class warfare notions promoted by pandering politicians and their relentless media allies&#8212;that the rich attained their wealth by exploiting the poor.  It then follows that unless we empower a modern day Robin Hood, individuals have no chance at prosperity. </p>
<p>But, citizens beware.  While Robin Hood was a community organizer of sorts, he was a fierce enemy of the tyrants atop a powerful, central government.  While Barack Obama wants you to believe that he is a new Robin Hood, a close inspection of his beliefs show a far greater resemblance to the Sheriff of Nottingham.</p>
<p>Economic liberty is a fundamental element of political liberty.  It is the cornerstone principle from which the American Dream has been built.  By trading it in for a false and immoral view of fairness, Americans will do nothing short of squandering their precious right to self-determination.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Read Ron@TheWisdomJournal&#180;s lastest article &#8211; <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheWisdomJournal/~3/436559483/" rel="nofollow">Standard of Living: The Next Bubble To Pop?</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron@TheWisdomJournal</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron@TheWisdomJournal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2416</guid>
		<description>Take it back? Take it back? It wasn&#039;t stolen, it was willingly given by you to purchase goods and services from business owners. The economic and financial ignorance I&#039;m seeing is only surpassed by the class envy and lack of understanding history and human psychology.

We have the highest standard of living in the world and it isn&#039;t because we &quot;spread the wealth.&quot; It&#039;s exactly the opposite. We encouraged the justice that comes from hard work. Just how much of YOUR wealth are you willing to let the government spread around? 

Ask yourself one question: when has Obama EVER cut taxes? He&#039;s letting the Bush tax cuts expire but refuses to say that it&#039;s a tax increase. He cannot be trusted.

And on Warren Buffet...give me a break. He has no earned income. It&#039;s all capital gains.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Read Ron@TheWisdomJournal&#180;s lastest article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheWisdomJournal/~3/436559483/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Standard of Living: The Next Bubble To Pop?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it back? Take it back? It wasn&#8217;t stolen, it was willingly given by you to purchase goods and services from business owners. The economic and financial ignorance I&#8217;m seeing is only surpassed by the class envy and lack of understanding history and human psychology.</p>
<p>We have the highest standard of living in the world and it isn&#8217;t because we &#8220;spread the wealth.&#8221; It&#8217;s exactly the opposite. We encouraged the justice that comes from hard work. Just how much of YOUR wealth are you willing to let the government spread around? </p>
<p>Ask yourself one question: when has Obama EVER cut taxes? He&#8217;s letting the Bush tax cuts expire but refuses to say that it&#8217;s a tax increase. He cannot be trusted.</p>
<p>And on Warren Buffet&#8230;give me a break. He has no earned income. It&#8217;s all capital gains.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Read Ron@TheWisdomJournal&#180;s lastest article &#8211; <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheWisdomJournal/~3/436559483/" rel="nofollow">Standard of Living: The Next Bubble To Pop?</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Robert Smith</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Robert Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>Rich is okay. Wealthy is fine. Comfortable is good. But 1% of the population has 25% of the wealth. And they did not get it by working hard. They stole it. We want it back.

The trick they play is that they invite everyone to work hard and try to get rich, but they (the exuberantly wealthy) are just pulling you along.

Wake up.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Read Steven Robert Smith&#180;s lastest article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://stevenrobertsmith.com/your-ultimatum/118&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Your Ultimatum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich is okay. Wealthy is fine. Comfortable is good. But 1% of the population has 25% of the wealth. And they did not get it by working hard. They stole it. We want it back.</p>
<p>The trick they play is that they invite everyone to work hard and try to get rich, but they (the exuberantly wealthy) are just pulling you along.</p>
<p>Wake up.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Read Steven Robert Smith&#180;s lastest article &#8211; <a href="http://stevenrobertsmith.com/your-ultimatum/118" rel="nofollow">Your Ultimatum</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cory huff</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2404</link>
		<dc:creator>cory huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2404</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s &quot;redistribution&quot; is hardly growing the size of government - at least, not in comparison to the Bush Administration.  Under the Bush administration the government has grown a larger percentage than any time since the Depression.  The largest non-military expenditures are Medicare &amp; Medicaid.  This has all been funded by deficit spending.  Obama is trying to balance the budget.

To reiterate on Katie Chin&#039;s point, 98% of small businesses will see no increase in their taxes.  Obama&#039;s health care plan is NOT socialized medicine.  It&#039;s improving on existing systems - giving tax benefits to people for buying health insurance, and enlarging the existing high risk pool that the government already uses (COBRA) in order to lower cost.  Small businesses that choose not to offer health insurance would pay a fee to help lower the cost on that high risk pool.  

It&#039;s true that someone will need to oversee this system, but it will fall to existing agencies like the IRS to ensure that this is running smoothly.

Socialism is an unfortunate word that has too much negativity tied to it.  Obama&#039;s plan is not socialism or redistribution in the traditional sense of the word.  It is merely expanding on existing systems.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Read cory huff&#180;s lastest article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HusbandsAndDads/~3/428666139/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Husbands &amp; Dads Refer a Friend Contest Update&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;redistribution&#8221; is hardly growing the size of government &#8211; at least, not in comparison to the Bush Administration.  Under the Bush administration the government has grown a larger percentage than any time since the Depression.  The largest non-military expenditures are Medicare &amp; Medicaid.  This has all been funded by deficit spending.  Obama is trying to balance the budget.</p>
<p>To reiterate on Katie Chin&#8217;s point, 98% of small businesses will see no increase in their taxes.  Obama&#8217;s health care plan is NOT socialized medicine.  It&#8217;s improving on existing systems &#8211; giving tax benefits to people for buying health insurance, and enlarging the existing high risk pool that the government already uses (COBRA) in order to lower cost.  Small businesses that choose not to offer health insurance would pay a fee to help lower the cost on that high risk pool.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that someone will need to oversee this system, but it will fall to existing agencies like the IRS to ensure that this is running smoothly.</p>
<p>Socialism is an unfortunate word that has too much negativity tied to it.  Obama&#8217;s plan is not socialism or redistribution in the traditional sense of the word.  It is merely expanding on existing systems.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Read cory huff&#180;s lastest article &#8211; <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HusbandsAndDads/~3/428666139/" rel="nofollow">Husbands &amp; Dads Refer a Friend Contest Update</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valerie</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2403</link>
		<dc:creator>valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2403</guid>
		<description>I agree with everyone who has commented so far, except you Jeff. :-) I especially liked what Elisa said. I&#039;m both a Canadian and American citizen and love both countries. But I love the way Canada takes care of poor and. I&#039;m very proud of our social programs to help the less fortunate. The struggling people I know work every bit as hard as the richer. They simply didn&#039;t have as many props to help them get established as well in early adulthood. They will spend their lives struggling and it&#039;s not because of laziness.

You said,&quot;There is an enormous amount of opportunity in this country. If not, then why are so many people from other nations still trying to immigrate here? Also, it seems that there are a ton of success stories of how people from other countries come here without anything only to build a successful business in just a few years.&quot; I point out that the people immigrating to North America do not come from countries where there are social programs to aid them. People from Denmark, Canada, and other &quot;socialistic&quot; countries see their country as superior. Those advantages are precisely why the League of Nations voted these countries as the best places in the world to live. The US is a ways down on the list and it&#039;s because of the lack of wealth distribution. 

Many come looking for greater opportunity and thankfully they find it. But those people are usually coming from poorer countries.

I feel very blessed to be doing ok financially. We live simply, but we live well. I am very willing to pay high taxes to help my neighbor who works 12 hours a day as a cab driver trying to take care of his family. Frustrating to see the lazy guy drawing a gov&#039;t check? Absolutely. But I prefer his cheating the system than the poor, elderly, and sick doing without the basics.

Great food for thought Jeff. Thanks.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Read valerie&#180;s lastest article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://meanderingsimply.blogspot.com/2008/10/psalm-23.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Psalm 23&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everyone who has commented so far, except you Jeff. <img src='http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I especially liked what Elisa said. I&#8217;m both a Canadian and American citizen and love both countries. But I love the way Canada takes care of poor and. I&#8217;m very proud of our social programs to help the less fortunate. The struggling people I know work every bit as hard as the richer. They simply didn&#8217;t have as many props to help them get established as well in early adulthood. They will spend their lives struggling and it&#8217;s not because of laziness.</p>
<p>You said,&#8221;There is an enormous amount of opportunity in this country. If not, then why are so many people from other nations still trying to immigrate here? Also, it seems that there are a ton of success stories of how people from other countries come here without anything only to build a successful business in just a few years.&#8221; I point out that the people immigrating to North America do not come from countries where there are social programs to aid them. People from Denmark, Canada, and other &#8220;socialistic&#8221; countries see their country as superior. Those advantages are precisely why the League of Nations voted these countries as the best places in the world to live. The US is a ways down on the list and it&#8217;s because of the lack of wealth distribution. </p>
<p>Many come looking for greater opportunity and thankfully they find it. But those people are usually coming from poorer countries.</p>
<p>I feel very blessed to be doing ok financially. We live simply, but we live well. I am very willing to pay high taxes to help my neighbor who works 12 hours a day as a cab driver trying to take care of his family. Frustrating to see the lazy guy drawing a gov&#8217;t check? Absolutely. But I prefer his cheating the system than the poor, elderly, and sick doing without the basics.</p>
<p>Great food for thought Jeff. Thanks.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Read valerie&#180;s lastest article &#8211; <a href="http://meanderingsimply.blogspot.com/2008/10/psalm-23.html" rel="nofollow">Psalm 23</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill B</title>
		<link>http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysuperchargedlife.com/blog/barack-obamas-wealth-redistribution-is-it-a-good-plan/#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>Redistribution of wealth is another way of saying &quot;taxes.&quot;  That&#039;s what taxes are - we&#039;ll always have tax, so making them fair and appropriate is a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redistribution of wealth is another way of saying &#8220;taxes.&#8221;  That&#8217;s what taxes are &#8211; we&#8217;ll always have tax, so making them fair and appropriate is a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

